Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU

AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon Sky 900 and 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Sky 900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 184% (2700MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Sky 900
3.405 TFLOPS
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU +143%
8.294 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2023
Radeon Sky
Generation
Console GPU(ASUS)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
-

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.59 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
518.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
30W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Phoenix
Orthrus
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
25.39 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
178 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy