Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (6.496GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 24W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R300
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
203 MHz
Memory Clock
143 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
16MB
DDR
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
2.288GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
-
4
TMUs
2
4
ROPs
2
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
286.0 MPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
286.0 MTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV360
GPU Name
VSA-101
-
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
Rage 9
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
180 nm
0.06 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
76 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Board Design

24W
TDP
15W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0 (9_0)
DirectX
6.0
2.0
OpenGL
1.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
-
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy