Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

ATI Radeon X1050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 3.200GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon R400 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
200 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3.200GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

24W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV410
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
R400
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.12 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
-
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy