Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
Lower TDP (20W vs 41W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
390 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Board Design

41W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
Floppy
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
RV380
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
-
R500
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
9.0
2.1
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy