Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
216 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
390 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
-
Shading Units
216
4
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Floppy
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
GT200
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
R500
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy