Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 AGP vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

ATI Radeon X1650 AGP vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
-
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV530 X1650 (215CCCBKB12FG)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy