Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Feb 2010
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
-
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
219W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
G92B
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy