Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs NVIDIA NVS 510

ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs NVIDIA NVS 510

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Oct 2012
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
GK107
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy