Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2014
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
-
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
Orthrus
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy