Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1650 GT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 4350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
80 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
1
-
Shading Units
80
8
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
RV710
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
RV710 (215-0725016)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy