Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI

ATI Radeon X1650 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
40 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2007
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
40
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
RV610
-
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy