Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD FireStream 9370

ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD FireStream 9370

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2010
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
-
Shading Units
1600
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale 2
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy