Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

ATI Radeon X1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
-
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy