Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2017
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 5.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
90 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy