Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs AMD FirePro S9000

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs AMD FirePro S9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2012
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
22.24GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

44W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV535
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV535 FSC
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
R500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy