Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1950 GT AGP and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1950 GT AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (57W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Aug 2018
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
3584
12
TMUs
224
12
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
6.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

57W
TDP
230W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x Molex
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV570
GPU Name
Vega 10
RV570 XL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
R500
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy