Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1950 PRO DUAL vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

ATI Radeon X1950 PRO DUAL vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon X1950 PRO DUAL and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1950 PRO DUAL 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 44.16GB/s)
216 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
690 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
44.16GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
-
Shading Units
216
12
TMUs
72
12
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.900 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
6.900 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV570
GPU Name
GT200
RV570 XT (215PADAKA12FG)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
R500
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy