Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 125W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jun 2017
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1050 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
10.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R580+
GPU Name
Lexa
R580+ XT (215BAABKA31FG)
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
R500
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
90 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.384 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy