ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO AGP and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 31.36GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (17W vs 49W)
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon R400 AGP
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
490 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
31.36GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
80
12
TMUs
8
12
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
49W
TDP
17W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x Molex
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R420
GPU Name
Cedar
R420 GTO
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
R400
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.16 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
281 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0b (9_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.0
