Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M3900

NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2025MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2400 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation +4220%
10.37 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Oct 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
2025 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
2560
Shading Units
160
80
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

97.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
162.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
10.37 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.37 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
162.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Seymour
-
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy