NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (2130MHz vs 1545MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 10GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+8%
12 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX
11.07 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+91%
2649
CMP 50HX
1384
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jun 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
56
2816
Shading Units
3584
88
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
80
88
Tensor Cores
448
22
RT Cores
56
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
