Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM CMP 70HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (2130MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
NVIDIA CMP 70HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +12%
12 TFLOPS
CMP 70HX
10.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
608.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
30
2816
Shading Units
3840
88
TMUs
120
48
ROPs
64
88
Tensor Cores
120
22
RT Cores
30
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
167.4 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.71 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.71 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
167.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GA104
-
GPU Variant
GA104-100-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy