Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 265W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +263%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2016
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
1792
88
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
265W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy