CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
VS
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+15689%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GT
0.076 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
GeForce 8600 GT
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
32
88
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.640 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
76.16 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-303-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
47W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
2
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
4
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
5
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
6
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
7
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs MTT S50
9
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 3850
10
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 810
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy