Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V3900

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2336 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1823%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2012
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
480
88
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy