CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 171W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+2138%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
216
88
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
28
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
3
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
5
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
7
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
8
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
9
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
10
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V7800P
Related News
1
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
2
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
3
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
4
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
5
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
6
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
7
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
8
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
9
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
10
Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy