Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +2138%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
216
88
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
28
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy