NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V8800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 208W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+354%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
1600
88
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
208W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
