Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 70W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
2
48
ROPs
2
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
VSA-101
-
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
180 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy