Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 330 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 330 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 330 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 149% (2130MHz vs 855MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 330 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +2093%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 330 OEM
0.547 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
May 2015
Quadro Ada
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
830 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
855 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
320
88
TMUs
20
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.840 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.10 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
547.2 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Hainan
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy