NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+4360%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
640MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
14
2816
Shading Units
112
88
TMUs
28
48
ROPs
20
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.0
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
