NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 14 years late

Boost Clock2130MHz

Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)

2576 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (70W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1829%

12 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

0.622 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

VS

GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

Graphics Card

Feb 2024

Release Date

Feb 2010

Quadro Ada

Generation

GeForce 200

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz

Base Clock

-

2130 MHz

Boost Clock

-

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1134 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

896MB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR3

128bit

Memory Bus

448bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

127.0GB/s

Render Config

22

SM Count

30

-

Compute Units

-

2816

Shading Units

240

88

TMUs

80

48

ROPs

28

88

Tensor Cores

-

22

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

-

12 MB

L2 Cache

224 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

17.72 GPixel/s

187.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

50.64 GTexel/s

12.00 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

12.00 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

622.1 GFLOPS

187.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

G92B

-

GPU Variant

G92-421-B1

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Tesla

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

55 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

0.754 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

260 mm²

Board Design

70W

TDP

219W

250 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

2x DVI

None

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

11.1 (10_0)

4.6

OpenGL

3.3

3.0

OpenCL

1.1

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

8.9

CUDA

1.3

6.7

Shader Model

4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

4

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

6

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

7

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip