Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +6282%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
9
2816
Shading Units
72
88
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy