Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 645 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 91.87GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 102W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1242%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 645 OEM
0.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2012
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
957 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
91.87GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
6
2816
Shading Units
288
88
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
24
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.312 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.25 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
894.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.50 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
102W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GF114
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy