Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W2100

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 213% (2130MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +2658%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
630 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
680 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
2816
Shading Units
320
88
TMUs
20
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
26W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy