NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+29%
15.56 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
4096
88
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
256
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
22 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
