CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
VS
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 19 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 70W)
Score
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
Quadro FX 540
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Aug 2004
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
NV43
-
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
110 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
4
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
6
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
7
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
8
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 3450 AGP
9
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
10
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy