CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 3450 AGP
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 3450 AGP
VS
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
ATI Radeon HD 3450 AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3450 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3450 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+24900%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3450 AGP
0.048 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
Radeon HD 3450 AGP
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
2816
Shading Units
40
88
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 LE
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x Molex
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
2
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
4
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
5
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
6
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
7
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
9
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
10
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy