Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 4710

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 4710

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 4710 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4710 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +2400%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4710
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
320
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
59W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 CE
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy