Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T600

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM T600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 60% (2130MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +602%
12 TFLOPS
T600
1.709 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
10
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
640
88
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
53.40 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.418 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.709 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy