Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2736 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +12400%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4350
0.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
80
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV710
-
GPU Variant
RV710 (215-0725016)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy