Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 5770

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 5770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +782%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5770
1.36 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Oct 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
800
88
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.60 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1360 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
108W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Juniper
-
GPU Variant
Juniper XT (215-0754013)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy