Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V3750

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +3309%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
320
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
48W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy