NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M3100

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation AMD FirePro M3100

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 187% (2010MHz vs 700MHz)

More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)

2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +1816%

10.29 TFLOPS

FirePro M3100

0.537 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

VS

FirePro M3100

Graphics Card

Mar 2023

Release Date

Unknown

Quadro Ada-M

Generation

FirePro Mobile

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz

Base Clock

650 MHz

2010 MHz

Boost Clock

700 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1000 MHz

Memory

8GB

Memory Size

1024MB

GDDR6

Memory Type

DDR3

128bit

Memory Bus

128bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

32.00GB/s

Render Config

20

SM Count

-

Compute Units

6

2560

Shading Units

384

80

TMUs

24

48

ROPs

8

80

Tensor Cores

-

20

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

12 MB

L2 Cache

256 KB

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

5.600 GPixel/s

160.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

16.80 GTexel/s

10.29 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

10.29 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

537.6 GFLOPS

160.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

-

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

Mars

-

GPU Variant

Mars M2 LP (216-0842009)

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

GCN 1.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

28 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

0.95 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

77 mm²

Board Design

50W

TDP

Unknown

-

Suggested PSU

-

Portable Device Dependent

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

None

Power Connectors

-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (11_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.1 (1.2)

1.3

Vulkan

1.2.170

8.9

CUDA

-

6.7

Shader Model

6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q

2

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile

3

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

4

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750

6

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6550A

7

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro W6500M

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Mac Edition

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

Related News

1

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

2

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

3

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

4

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

5

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

6

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

7

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

8

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

9

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

10

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower