Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6610M

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 6610M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2592 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +2758%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6610M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Vancouver
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
480
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.80 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
26W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Whistler
-
GPU Variant
Whistler LP
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy