NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 75% (2010MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+424%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 965M
2.355 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2016
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
935 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.80 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.60 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.355 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GM206S
-
GPU Variant
N16E-GR-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
