Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 8750A

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 8750A

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 8750A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 8750A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +2578%
12.35 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 8750A
0.461 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
460.8 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Mars
-
GPU Variant
Mars XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy