Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (1455MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +1021%
8.94 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
3
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GP108B
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy