Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9390 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 94% (2115MHz vs 1089MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +232%
12.99 TFLOPS
Radeon E9390 PCIe
3.903 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1635 MHz
Base Clock
713 MHz
2115 MHz
Boost Clock
1089 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1792
96
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

101.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.85 GPixel/s
203.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
122.0 GTexel/s
12.99 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.903 TFLOPS
12.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.903 TFLOPS
203.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy