NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (2600MHz vs 2250MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
23.04 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700
+38%
31.95 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
48
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
3072
160
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
96
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
48
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
48 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
190W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
Navi 32
-
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
