Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A780

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A780

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 200W)
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (2200MHz vs 2175MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 360.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +48%
26.73 TFLOPS
Arc A780
18.02 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Workstation Ada
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
2200 MHz
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
4096
192
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
192
Tensor Cores
512
48
RT Cores
32
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
200W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net